Already a member? Sign in.
Register or learn more.

Most Reviewed Sites

Show more...
Home arrow Directory

Mar 04
2008

Five rules for effective writing

Posted by stevenl in Writing exercisesWriting

avatar

If you want to be clear, if you want to be quoted, using effective language must be your top priority.In today's business and politics this is hardly ever the case. In many instances, imprecise language is used intentionally to avoid taking a stance. This is hardly a recent problem, and as George Orwell wrote in his 1946 essay, Politics and the English Language, the condition is curable. By following Orwell's five rules for writing, you'll distinguish yourself from competitors and clearly communicate your ideas:

This last effort of the mind cuts out all stale or mixed images, all prefabricated phrases, needless repetitions, and humbug and vagueness generally. But one can often be in doubt about the effect of a word or a phrase, and one needs rules that one can rely on when instinct fails. I thinkthe following rules will cover most cases:

  1. Never use a metaphor, simile, or other figure of speech which you are used to seeing in print.
  2. Never use a long word where a short one will do.
  3. If it is possible to cut a word out, always cut it out.
  4. Never use the passive where you can use the active.
  5. Never use a foreign phrase, a scientific word, or a jargon word if you can think of an everyday English equivalent.
  6. Break any of these rules sooner than say anything outright barbarous.

These rules sound elementary, and so they are, but they demand a deep change of attitude in anyone who has grown used to writing in the style now fashionable. One could keep all of them and still write bad English, but one could not write the kind of stuff that I quoted in those five specimens at the beginning of this article.

I hope you find these rules a good start. If you enjoyed this brief journal entry, be sure to read Orwell's original essay. It has many helpful examples and is a joy to read.



Comments (1)add comment

anthrasula said:

 
These are great except the rule pertaining to the passive voice. This is simply a notion held by native English speakers. I've been tortured with enough Latin to realize that passive sentences are often much easier to read and understand when used with a passive verb. In Latin, when an action in the perfect tense requires two accusatives it's considered good form to change the sentence into the Perfect Passive with a supine stem. It depends on the situation and this is a stupid blanket rule.
March 04, 2008

Write comment
You must be logged in to a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy

Sponsored Listings

Books Inq. A behind-the-scenes look at a book-review editor's world by Frank Wilson. Wilson is The Philadelphia Inquirer's Book Review Editor and authors an "Editor's Choice" column each Sunday in the Books section. He has been on the paper's staff since 1980. A Philadelphia native, his poems have been published in First Things and Boulevard. Visit it here. {hidetags}

Submitted by: 
 anthrasula

   Past Picks

 

LinkPlug! Resources

LinkPlug! - Business & Economy - Publishing Industries - Books

submission guidelines | membership drive | link to us | privacy policy | terms of use | syndicate  | donate | sitemap
created and maintained by
Ahadada Books